Growth Diagnostic

Find out what’s holding back your growth. And know what to do about it.

A two-week engagement that finds your biggest growth opportunities and turns them into a prioritized Growth Action Plan, so you stop guessing what to do next and start breaking through your growth stall.

Zac LitwackSee if the Growth Diagnostic is right for you 30-minute conversation with Zac · No sales pitch
Matt Whipple
“You completely transformed The Pour Over’s growth strategy”
–Matt Whipple, Head of Growth, The Pour Over
$100,000,000+
in ad spend managed
$85,000,000
exit to Fox Corp
1,000,000,000+
in streams & pageviews

Growth doesn’t need to be this confusing

“There are so many things we could be doing, but what should we do right now?”
“I’m not sure how to really push the envelope and get out of iterative gains. I don’t want 10%, I want 100%.”
“I’m too inside my own funnels, I’m not sure what we are potentially missing here.”
“Growth isn’t as easy as it used to be, I think the journey or product or audience needs to change.”
“We’re about to make a big strategic bet and I don’t know if it’s the right move. I could really use a second opinion.”

That’s why we built the Growth Diagnostic. It starts with what you think your biggest growth constraint is, shows you what’s really going on, and how to fix it. Then it looks at your growth system for the few opportunities that can move the number 100%, not another 10%.

See if the Growth Diagnostic is right for you

how it works

01
Intake Call
A 60-minute call to understand your business and find out what you currently believe is the biggest growth constraint.
02
Diagnosis
Delivered within two weeks of receiving access. We work from read-only access to your systems, plus targeted questions to one internal owner.
03
Growth Action Plan
You receive your Growth Action Plan: the top constraints, ranked opportunities, and what to do in the first 90 days. We review it together in a 90 minute meeting and align on next steps.
Example Growth Action Plan, a D2C subscription brand at a $28M run rate.

This is a simplified version. Yours gives every ranked opportunity its own brief, and turns the first 90 days into a project plan.

When they switched payment providers in March, the system went from chasing a declined card four times over two weeks to once over three days. They went from saving 31% of those customers to 6%. That is about 835 people a month who wanted to stay and left anyway. More than half of all cancellations are now people who never chose to cancel, and nobody on the team owns that number.

Frequency on the main prospecting audience is 4.2, up from 2.6 a year ago, and what it costs to reach them has climbed with it. 68% of last quarter’s spend went to four ads, all of them more than 5 months old. The symptom is content frequency, but the root cause is actually their testing process. For example, 12 outstanding tests last quarter weren’t even formally called.

New customers used to come back for a second order 44% of the time. Now it is 36%. It slipped a little every month for over a year, which is why nobody caught it. The dashboard shows one repeat rate for everybody, and that stayed flat, because subscribers kept ordering and hid what was happening to first-time buyers.

Nine percent of subscribers ship to a business address. They order 2.4 times the volume of a household subscriber and cancel at a third the rate. Put a workplace plan in front of the accounts already shipping to offices and watch the take rate.

The top six, scored on impact, confidence and ease. Sequence is not the same as score: the retention fixes come first, because keeping more customers raises what you can afford to spend winning new ones.

#OpportunityAreaScoreKnown?
1Go back to trying declined cards four times over two weeksTechnology9.0New
2Offer a workplace plan to the accounts already shipping to officesPlan8.8New
3Fix the page where customers update their card, which fails 18% of the timeTechnology8.7New
4Call the 12 outstanding ad tests, and agree what finished meansProcess8.5Known, unsized
5Give one person ownership of failed payments, with a weekly reportPeople8.3New
6Increase testing cadence to 24 ads a month once the process holdsProcess8.0Known, unsized

What to do first, what to hold, and what evidence would change the order.

Day 1
Turn the card retries back on, and put one person in charge of failed payments
Week 1
Fix the card update page, start a weekly failed-payments report, and call the 12 outstanding ad tests
Weeks 2 to 4
Agree what finished means for a test, put a testing calendar in place, and line up the creative capacity for 24 a month. Run the new process at today’s 12.
Month 2 onward
Move production from 12 to 24 ads a month, offer a workplace plan to the accounts already shipping to offices, and test a 21-day follow-up after a first order
Held
Increasing spend, until failed payments have recovered for four weeks straight. The ad work raises output, not budget.
Matt Whipple

“Not to overstate it, you completely transformed The Pour Over’s growth strategy: we began feeding a quality/value signal back to Meta, shifted optimization toward higher-quality leads, doubled click rate in comparable cohorts, and increased spend by 30% while improving LTV to CAC in the process.”

Matt Whipple, Head of Growth, The Pour Over
Daniel Dorfman

“Zac and 4th Quarter helped us grow from $10M to $300M+ invested on Roots by building the system behind our growth. They connected our data, channels, and testing cadence into one operating machine, giving us a repeatable way to find leverage, understand what’s driving performance, and compound what works.”

Daniel Dorfman, CEO and Co-founder, Roots
Glenn Clayton

“4th Quarter is Fieldcrest Ventures’ secret weapon. They audit growth assumptions before I invest and serve as the plug-and-play growth operating partner once I invest, de-risking my investments and improving returns.”

Glenn Clayton, Founder of Fieldcrest Ventures
See if the Growth Diagnostic is right for you

Why this is different

01
Most audits stop at the channel

A channel audit grades one channel against its own benchmarks and assumes the constraint lives there. Most of the time it does not. A symptom may surface in the channel, but its root cause is usually somewhere else entirely, like checkout, onboarding, or audience.

The Growth Diagnostic starts at your Growth System: your plan, people, process, technology and timing. You still get the channel optimizations, but you understand and have a plan for the root cause issues that may be happening at the system level.

02
An AI harness we built, and a person who still runs it

We built our own diagnostic harness on Claude Code. It does the parts a machine is good at: mapping the context, working through the data, and checking claims against a second source. Zac still runs the Growth Diagnostic.

The harness also matches patterns across our libraries, 709 and growing, including growth loops, channel methodologies, category creation stories, and how top growth operators think.

That is how all five parts of the Growth System get covered properly in two weeks, how a claim gets checked against a second source before it becomes a finding, and how we leverage AI to catch what even experienced growth operators may miss.

Your investment

$20,000
Paid upfront

A two-week turnaround begins once payment is received and the intake call and access are complete. You own the entire diagnosis and the Growth Action Plan. 4th Quarter can partner with you to help you implement the plan.

See if the Growth Diagnostic is right for you

Growth misses really add up

$3M to $10M
Untapped growth loop
If a $10M revenue company misses a growth loop opportunity (referral mechanism, channel or content loop), it could cost them millions of dollars over the next year. At $50M in revenue, easily tens of millions.
6 to 12 months
Leadership alignment around the wrong opportunities
The hardest cost to see is the most expensive one: the wrong diagnosis becomes the plan, the plan becomes the roadmap, and the wrong roadmap absorbs another 6 to 12 months.
$250K+
Wrong senior hire
A Head of Growth can cost $250K+ loaded in year one before counting recruiting, ramp time, and the opportunity cost of scoping the role around the wrong problem.
$100K–$250K/mo
Inefficient paid media
At $500K/month in spend, even a 20% misallocation is $100K/month. At $1M/month, it is $250K/month, before counting bad feedback loops.
See if the Growth Diagnostic is right for you

Meet your growth guide

Hi, I’m Zac Litwack. I’ve managed over $100 million in ad spend and built audiences into the billions of pageviews and streams. I helped grow OutKick and sell it to Fox in 2021, and most recently I ran growth at Roots, taking it from about $10 million to over $300 million invested on the platform.

Even after operating growth functions for over 15 years, I still get blind spots when I’m running the same company for a few years. You test your original hypotheses. Some work. You build playbooks around them, and you get caught iterating on the same playbooks over and over again. You have trouble seeing the proverbial forest from the trees as you get closer and closer to the data and your users.

That is not a personal failing. It is what happens to every growth system as the company outgrows it.

What got you to $10 million usually won’t get you to $50 million or $100 million. These inflection points stress test your growth system, and if it doesn’t have a solid foundation you’re going to falter. That may be what you’re feeling right now.

I’ve missed things in my own business that someone from the outside would have caught in an afternoon.

That’s why we created the Growth Diagnostic: when you combine that fresh perspective and experience with AI, great things happen.

Zac Litwack

See if the Growth Diagnostic is right for you

Thank you! Zac and team will take a look at the information and be back with you shortly with next steps and availability.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.